![]() This design consisted of three distinct phases: quantitative, qualitative and implementation phases. This analysis formed part of a mixed methods multiphase design research project, with both qualitative and quantitative inquiry and involving the convergence of data and analyses. This article details the codebook development which contributed to thematic analysis of qualitative data. However, a well described qualitative methodology could demonstrate and ensure the same effect. Rigour in quantitative research is often determined through detailed explanation allowing replication, but the ability to replicate is often not considered appropriate in qualitative research. As one of research's aims is to determine the relationship between knowledge and practice through the demonstration of rigour, more detailed descriptions of methods could prove useful. While qualitative research methodologies are now mature, there often remains a lack of fine detail in their description both at submitted peer reviewed article level and in textbooks. This is compounded by the fact that detailed descriptions of methods are often omitted from qualitative discussions. It may help to optimize recruitment and interviewing of participants and promote meaningful utilization of the data they provide, thus maximizing benefits for healthcare consumers in general.Navigating the world of qualitative thematic analysis can be challenging. Patient or healthcare consumer involvement: This work does not directly involve healthcare consumers but contributes to improvement of data collection and analysis in qualitative research, where healthcare consumers are central. ![]() Results will be available for the Colloquium.Ĭonclusions: Will be available for the Colloquium. The collation of codes resulted in an initial codebook containing 28 codes defined in detail, categorised under 5 themes. Results: Stage 1 resulted in 57, 36, 43, 27, 29, and 34 codes for the first six interviews, respectively. Coding was performed independently by two researchers, at both stages, with subsequent consensus reached through discussion. The development of the codebook was based on the thematic analysis of the interviews and consisted of two stages: 1) inductive coding of six interviews (Table 1) resulting in the establishment of a preliminary codebook and 2) application of the codebook to the remaining 50 interviews, resulting in refinement of the codebook and establishment of the point of saturation. We sought a heterogeneous sample of editors through purposive maximum variation sampling and conducted 56 semi-structured interviews between September 2017 and February 2018. Methods: The original study for which data were collected examined communication practices within the peer review process of biomedical journals from the editors’ point of view. The specific objective of this study is to demonstrate how to achieve saturation in a methodical manner through the development and modification of a codebook. Objectives: This methodological study aims to contribute to the operationalization of saturation and offer evidence-based recommendations regarding sample sizes for qualitative interviews using thematic analysis. However, few studies report in detail on the process of achieving saturation. Achieving saturation of concepts or themes is often used as a criterion for discontinuing data collection. ![]() Background: Sample size considerations in qualitative research typically rely on saturation, which broadly refers to the point where no further information is obtained from interviewing additional subjects. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |